We Connect Review: Too Buggy and Risky for Serious LinkedIn Prospecting
Jun 16, 2025
You've probably heard about We Connect as a LinkedIn automation tool that promises to streamline your prospecting efforts. Maybe you're tired of manually sending connection requests and follow-up messages, dreaming of a tool that could handle the heavy lifting while you focus on closing deals.

But before you dive headfirst into automated LinkedIn outreach, there's a reality check you need to hear. After analyzing dozens of user reviews and real-world experiences, We Connect presents a concerning picture of buggy performance and significant account safety risks that could jeopardize your professional reputation.
What Users Actually Say About We Connect
The Good: When It Works, It's Convenient
Let's start with what users appreciate about We Connect. According to reviews on GetApp, some users find the platform "easy to use, easy to set up" with responsive customer support. One long-term user shared: "I've used other LI messaging software and We-Connect is the best I've found and have been a happy customer for over 2 years."
The tool does deliver on its core promise of automating LinkedIn tasks. As noted by Platypus Reviews, "This platform helps automate various LinkedIn tasks like sending connection requests, viewing profiles, and sending messages." For busy professionals, this automation can free up significant time that would otherwise be spent on manual outreach.
We Connect also offers some thoughtful features for relationship management. According to Software Advice reviews, "We-Connect lets users blacklist specific contacts, track the status of outreach, generate reports." The ability to set up automated follow-ups is particularly valuable, as SalesRobot's review notes: "They can set up follow-up messages for prospects that don't immediately respond."
The Ugly Reality: Bugs Everywhere
However, the positive experiences are overshadowed by a consistent pattern of technical issues that plague the platform. Multiple users across different review sites report the same frustrating problem: We Connect is simply too buggy for reliable use.

A review on Software Advice captures this frustration perfectly: "The features sound good in theory, but when you work with them you will realize many bugs." This isn't just one disgruntled user – it's a recurring theme that appears across multiple platforms.
The SalesRobot review confirms this assessment, stating that "Users complain about We-Connect being a product full of bugs, compromising proper functioning." When your outreach campaigns are compromised by technical glitches, you're not just wasting time – you're potentially damaging relationships with prospects who receive broken or duplicate messages.
Performance issues compound the problem. GetApp reviews indicate that "Some users find the tool performance to be slow," which can be particularly frustrating when you're trying to execute time-sensitive campaigns.
Customer Support Falls Short

When technical issues arise, you'd expect reliable customer support to help resolve them quickly. Unfortunately, this is another area where We Connect disappoints users. A GetApp review reveals the harsh reality: "The support is miserable. Average reply time is 1-2 days."
In the fast-paced world of sales and marketing, waiting 1-2 days for support responses can mean missed opportunities and frustrated prospects. When your campaigns are already compromised by bugs, slow support response times add insult to injury.
Limited Features Unless You Pay Premium
We Connect follows a common SaaS playbook of limiting advanced features to higher-tier plans. GetApp reviews note that "Advanced features only available on higher-tier plans." This means you'll need to upgrade from the basic $29/month Networking plan to access more sophisticated automation capabilities.
The pricing structure includes:
Networking Plan: $29/month for basic automation
Growth Plan: $69/month for unlimited campaigns and team features
Professional Plan: $79/month for multi-channel outreach
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for larger organizations
While the pricing isn't unreasonable compared to competitors, the feature limitations mean you'll likely need to invest in higher-tier plans to get meaningful value from the platform.
Reporting and Analytics Shortcomings
Another consistent complaint centers around We Connect's reporting capabilities. Software Advice reviews point out that "Statistics could be more detailed and visible."
When you're running automated campaigns, detailed analytics are crucial for optimizing performance and proving ROI. Without comprehensive reporting, you're essentially flying blind, unable to identify which messages resonate with your audience or which targeting parameters drive the best results.
The LinkedIn Account Safety Elephant in the Room
Perhaps the most concerning aspect of using We Connect isn't the bugs or poor support – it's the very real risk of having your LinkedIn account restricted or banned. LinkedIn's Terms of Service explicitly prohibit automation tools, and the consequences can be severe.
According to Woodpecker's analysis, "Any member who uses tools for such purposes is in violation of the User Agreement. This means that they risk having their accounts restricted or shut down."
Real Users Report Account Restrictions
This isn't just theoretical risk – users are actually experiencing account restrictions. Breakcold's research confirms that "Some people get banned when they're using LinkedIn automation tools."
Covetedconsultant.com warns that "using automation on LinkedIn puts you at risk of a banned account and damaged professional reputation." The stakes are particularly high for professionals who rely on LinkedIn for networking and business development.
Why LinkedIn Cracks Down on Automation
LinkedIn's stance against automation isn't arbitrary – it's designed to maintain the platform's professional integrity. We Connect's own blog acknowledges potential restrictions, noting that "You're sending too many connection requests" can trigger account limitations.
The platform uses sophisticated algorithms to detect unnatural activity patterns. If you're suddenly sending 50+ connection requests per day or your messaging patterns appear robotic, LinkedIn's systems will flag your account for review.
The Professional Reputation Risk
Beyond account restrictions, there's a subtler but equally damaging risk: appearing spammy to your professional network. Automated messages often lack the personal touch that makes LinkedIn networking effective. Recipients can usually tell when they're receiving templated outreach, which can actually hurt your professional brand.
Salesrobot's analysis notes that "If you're sending too many connection requests, or you've received too many 'I don't know this person' responses, it can get your account restricted." This creates a vicious cycle where aggressive automation leads to negative responses, which then triggers LinkedIn's protective measures.
Cloud-Based Architecture: A Double-Edged Sword
We Connect markets itself as a cloud-based solution, which SalesRobot's review describes as offering "better security" compared to desktop-based tools. The theory is that cloud-based automation is harder for LinkedIn to detect since it doesn't require browser extensions or local software installations.
However, this supposed advantage doesn't eliminate the fundamental issue: LinkedIn's Terms of Service prohibit all forms of automation, regardless of the technical implementation. A cloud-based approach might delay detection, but it doesn't make the activity compliant or safe.
Beyond Automation: Streamlining Your LinkedIn Inbox with Kondo
While tools like We Connect focus on automating outreach, often with significant risks, many professionals find their biggest LinkedIn bottleneck is managing the sheer volume of messages after connections are made. If your LinkedIn inbox feels chaotic and leads to missed opportunities, a different kind of tool might be the answer.
Enter Kondo, a solution designed to transform your LinkedIn messaging experience. Often described as 'Superhuman for LinkedIn,' Kondo focuses on making your Direct Messages manageable, efficient, and productive, without resorting to risky automation.

Here’s how Kondo helps you conquer your LinkedIn inbox:
Declutter and Organize: Instead of a single, overwhelming feed, Kondo allows you to use Labels & Split Inboxes. You can categorize conversations (e.g., 'Hot Lead', 'Candidate', 'Client') and view them in dedicated, prioritized inboxes. This means critical messages no longer get buried.
Never Miss a Follow-Up: With Reminders (Snooze), you can easily schedule follow-ups for any conversation. The message vanishes and reappears at the top of your inbox when it’s time to act, ensuring you stay on top of important interactions without manual tracking.
Work at Lightning Speed: Keyboard Shortcuts let you navigate your inbox, archive messages, set reminders, apply labels, and open profiles without touching your mouse, dramatically speeding up how you process messages.
Consistent and Personalized Messaging: Snippets allow you to save and reuse common replies or outreach messages, complete with variables like the recipient's first name. This saves time on repetitive typing while maintaining a personal touch.

Is Kondo Safe to Use?
A critical concern with any LinkedIn-related tool is account safety. Kondo has been built from the ground up with LinkedIn's Terms of Service in mind. As detailed on their safety information page:
Kondo does not automate activity: It doesn't send bulk messages, sequence messages, or offer auto-replies. All interactions are user-initiated.
Kondo does not scrape LinkedIn pages or modify their appearance.
Your LinkedIn data is kept safe: Kondo uses your browser's active session cookie (it doesn't store your credentials) and caches message data locally on your computer, not on its servers.
By focusing on enhancing the user's ability to manage their inbox effectively, Kondo helps professionals like SDRs, recruiters, founders, and consultants reclaim time and reduce inbox anxiety, all while staying compliant with LinkedIn's policies.
If you're looking for a powerful way to manage your LinkedIn communications without the risks associated with automation, Kondo offers a compelling solution. You can learn more about how Kondo helps you achieve Inbox Zero and focus on valuable conversations by visiting trykondo.com.
Alternatives to Consider
Given We Connect's limitations and risks, you might want to explore alternative approaches:
Manual Outreach with Templates
While time-consuming, manual outreach with personalized templates ensures LinkedIn compliance while maintaining authenticity. Tools like TextExpander or PhraseExpress can help streamline message composition without violating platform rules.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
LinkedIn's official premium tool provides advanced search capabilities and relationship insights without the compliance risks associated with third-party automation tools.
Email-First Approach
Consider building email lists through legitimate lead generation tactics and conducting outreach via email, where automation is more accepted and less risky.
Pricing Analysis: Is It Worth the Cost?
Let's break down We Connect's pricing in context of its limitations:
Networking Plan ($29/month): Limited to one active campaign, making it insufficient for serious prospecting efforts. The feature set is too basic for most business applications.
Growth Plan ($69/month): Offers unlimited campaigns and team features, but you're still dealing with the same underlying bugs and safety concerns. At $828/year, this represents a significant investment for a potentially risky tool.
Professional Plan ($79/month): Includes multi-channel outreach capabilities, but the LinkedIn automation risks remain. The email features might provide some value, but dedicated email marketing tools often offer better functionality at lower costs.
The pricing becomes even less attractive when you factor in the potential cost of losing your LinkedIn account. For many professionals, their LinkedIn presence is worth thousands of dollars in networking value and business opportunities.
User Experience: The Technical Reality
Beyond the safety concerns, We Connect's user experience suffers from the technical issues mentioned throughout reviews. Platypus Reviews notes that "Too many users reported that the tool is buggy."
These bugs aren't minor inconveniences – they can severely impact your campaigns:
Messages might not send properly
Connection requests could fail without notification
Campaign sequences might skip steps or repeat actions
Reporting data may be inaccurate or incomplete
When you're paying $69-79 per month for automation, you expect reliability. The widespread reports of bugs suggest that We Connect hasn't achieved the stability needed for professional use.
The Verdict: Proceed with Extreme Caution
After analyzing user reviews and real-world experiences, We Connect presents a concerning combination of technical issues, safety risks, and limited support quality. While some users report positive experiences, the consistent patterns of bugs, account restrictions, and poor customer service make it difficult to recommend for serious professionals.
Who Might Consider We Connect Despite the Risks?
Users who can afford to lose their LinkedIn accounts
Professionals with backup LinkedIn profiles
Those conducting small-scale, low-stakes outreach experiments
Who Should Definitely Avoid We Connect?
Sales professionals whose livelihood depends on LinkedIn
Anyone using their primary LinkedIn account for business
Users who need reliable, bug-free automation
Professionals who can't risk their LinkedIn reputation
Better Alternatives for LinkedIn Prospecting
Instead of risking your account with We Connect, consider these safer approaches:
Manual Prospecting with Systems: Use spreadsheets and templates to systematize your outreach while maintaining personal touch
LinkedIn Sales Navigator: Leverage LinkedIn's official tools for advanced prospecting
Email-Based Outreach: Build legitimate email lists and conduct outreach through safer channels
Content Marketing: Attract prospects through valuable content rather than cold outreach
Final Thoughts
We Connect might seem like an attractive solution for LinkedIn automation, but the reality is far more complex. The combination of technical bugs, safety risks, and poor customer support creates a perfect storm of potential problems for users.
While automation can be tempting, the risks associated with LinkedIn automation tools like We Connect often outweigh the potential time savings. Your LinkedIn account is too valuable to risk on a buggy tool that violates platform terms of service.
If you're serious about LinkedIn prospecting, invest in learning manual techniques, use LinkedIn's official tools, or explore compliant alternatives. Your professional reputation and account safety are worth more than the convenience of automation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the most common complaints about We Connect?
The most common complaints about We Connect are its buggy performance, unreliable customer support, and the significant risk it poses to LinkedIn account safety. Users consistently report technical glitches that disrupt campaigns, slow response times from support, and instances of their LinkedIn accounts being restricted or banned due to We Connect's automation practices.
Is We Connect safe to use for LinkedIn automation?
No, We Connect is generally not considered safe to use for LinkedIn automation due to the high risk of account restrictions or bans from LinkedIn. LinkedIn's Terms of Service explicitly prohibit the use of automation tools, and many We Connect users have reported experiencing such penalties.
Why does LinkedIn penalize users of automation tools like We Connect?
LinkedIn penalizes users of automation tools to maintain the platform's integrity and user experience by preventing spammy or inauthentic activity. Tools like We Connect often trigger LinkedIn's detection systems by performing actions at an unnatural rate or pattern, such as sending too many connection requests, which violates their User Agreement.
What are the primary risks of using We Connect for LinkedIn?
The primary risks of using We Connect include having your LinkedIn account restricted or permanently banned, damaging your professional reputation by appearing spammy, and experiencing unreliable campaign performance due to software bugs. These risks can lead to loss of valuable network connections and business opportunities.
What is a safer alternative to We Connect for LinkedIn productivity?
A safer alternative for enhancing LinkedIn productivity without the risks of automation is Kondo. Kondo is designed to help you manage your LinkedIn inbox more efficiently with features like labels, reminders, and snippets, but it does not automate actions that violate LinkedIn's Terms of Service.
How does Kondo differ from We Connect in terms of LinkedIn safety?
Kondo differs significantly from We Connect in that it does not automate LinkedIn activities like sending connection requests or messages, thus aligning with LinkedIn's Terms of Service. We Connect automates outreach, which is prohibited and risky, while Kondo focuses on helping users manually manage their existing conversations more effectively and safely.
Who should avoid using We Connect for LinkedIn outreach?
Professionals whose livelihood depends on LinkedIn, those using their primary LinkedIn account for business, individuals needing reliable and bug-free performance, and anyone concerned about their professional reputation should avoid using We Connect. The potential for account suspension and damage to one's network outweighs the automation benefits for these users.